Skip to main content
Source

This page is generated from skills/terraform-skill/SKILL.md. Edit the source, not this page.

Third-party skill

This skill is maintained by Anton Babenko (terraform-best-practices.com, Compliance.tf) under the Apache-2.0 license. Upstream: https://github.com/antonbabenko/terraform-skill

Terraform Skill for Claude

Diagnose-first guidance for Terraform and OpenTofu. Core file is a workflow; depth lives in references loaded on demand.

Response Contract​

Every Terraform/OpenTofu response must include:

  1. Assumptions & version floor — runtime (terraform or tofu), exact version, providers, state backend, execution path (local/CI/Cloud/Atlantis), environment criticality. State assumptions explicitly if the user did not provide them.
  2. Risk category addressed — one or more of: identity churn, secret exposure, blast radius, CI drift, compliance gaps, state corruption, provider upgrade risk, testing blind spots.
  3. Chosen remediation & tradeoffs — what was chosen, what was traded off, why.
  4. Validation plan — exact commands (fmt -check, validate, plan -out, policy check) tailored to runtime and risk tier.
  5. Rollback notes — for any destructive or state-mutating change: how to undo, what evidence to keep.

Never recommend direct production apply without a reviewed plan artifact and approval.

Never run terraform destroy (targeted or full) without first running terraform plan -destroy and showing the user every resource that will be deleted — including implicit dependents pulled in via locals or for_each. Get explicit confirmation before proceeding. Never use -auto-approve on destroy.

Workflow​

  1. Capture execution context — runtime+version, provider(s), backend, execution path, environment criticality.
  2. Diagnose failure mode(s) using the routing table below. If intent spans categories, load both references.
  3. Load only the matching reference file(s) — do not preload depth the task does not need.
  4. Propose fix with risk controls — why this addresses the mode, what could still go wrong, guardrails (tests/approvals/rollback).
  5. Generate artifacts — HCL, migration blocks (moved, import), CI changes, policy rules.
  6. Validate before finalizing — run validation commands tailored to risk tier.
  7. Emit the Response Contract at the end.

Diagnose Before You Generate​

Failure categorySymptomsPrimary references
Identity churnResource addresses shift after refactor, count index churn, missing moved blocksCode Patterns: count vs for_each, Code Patterns: moved blocks, Code Patterns: LLM mistakes
Secret exposureSecrets in defaults, state, logs, CI artifactsSecurity & Compliance, Code Patterns: write-only, State Management
Blast radiusOversized stacks, shared prod/non-prod state, unsafe appliesState Management, Module Patterns
Destroy cascadeTargeted destroy deletes more than expected; locals referencing a targeted resource make all for_each consumers implicit dependentsResponse Contract: plan-destroy first; State Management: Safe Destroy
CI driftLocal plan ≠ CI plan, apply without reviewed artifact, unpinned versionsCI/CD Workflows, Code Patterns: versions
Compliance gapsMissing policy stage, no approval model, no evidence retentionSecurity & Compliance, CI/CD Workflows
Testing blind spotsPlan-only validation of computed values, set-type indexing, mock/real confusionTesting Frameworks
State corruption / recoveryStuck lock, backend migration, drift reconciliationState Management
Provider upgrade riskBreaking-change provider bump, unpinned modulesCode Patterns: versions, Module Patterns
Provider lifecycleRemoving a provider with resources still in state, orphaned resources, removed block usageState Management: Provider Removal
Bootstrap / orchestration misusenull_resource + local-exec for bootstrap, remote-exec for setup scripts, provisioner stdout leaking secrets in CI logsCode Patterns: Provisioners as Last Resort
Navigation / safe-rename blind spotsCannot locate symbol defs/refs semantically, value-symbol rename done as blind text replace, grep-only refactor missing refs, hallucinated rg shimCode Intelligence
Cross-cloud / provider mapping"What's the Azure/GCP equivalent of X", picking a backend/auth model per cloudState Management: Cross-cloud equivalents

When to Use This Skill​

Activate when: creating or reviewing Terraform/OpenTofu configurations or modules, setting up or debugging tests, structuring multi-environment deployments, implementing IaC CI/CD, choosing module patterns or state organization, configuring or migrating remote state backends.

Don't use for: basic HCL syntax questions Claude already knows, provider API reference (link to docs), cloud-platform questions unrelated to Terraform/OpenTofu.

Core Principles​

Module Hierarchy​

TypeWhen to UseScope
Resource moduleSingle logical group of connected resourcesVPC + subnets, SG + rules
Infrastructure moduleCollection of resource modules for a purposeMultiple resource modules in one region/account
CompositionComplete infrastructureSpans multiple regions/accounts

Flow: resource → resource module → infrastructure module → composition.

Directory Layout​

environments/ # prod/ staging/ dev/ — per-env configurations
modules/ # networking/ compute/ data/ — reusable modules
examples/ # minimal/ complete/ — docs + integration fixtures

Separate environments from modules. Use examples/ as both documentation and test fixtures. Keep modules small and single-responsibility.

See Module Patterns for architecture principles, naming conventions, variable/output contracts.

Naming Conventions (summary)​

  • Descriptive resource names (aws_instance.web_server, not aws_instance.main)
  • Reserve this for genuine singleton resources only
  • Prefix variables with context (vpc_cidr_block, not cidr)
  • Standard files: main.tf, variables.tf, outputs.tf, versions.tf

See Module Patterns: Variable Naming and Code Patterns: Block Ordering for examples.

Block Ordering (summary)​

Resource blocks: count/for_each first → arguments → tags → depends_on → lifecycle. Variable blocks: description → type → default → validation → nullable → sensitive.

See Code Patterns: Block Ordering & Structure for the full rules and examples.

Testing Strategy​

Decision Matrix: Which Testing Approach?​

SituationApproachToolsCost
Quick syntax checkStatic analysisvalidate, fmtFree
Pre-commit validationStatic + lintvalidate, tflint, trivy, checkovFree
Terraform 1.6+, simple logicNative test frameworkterraform testFree-Low
Pre-1.6, or Go expertiseIntegration testingTerratestLow-Med
Security/compliance focusPolicy as codeOPA, SentinelFree
Cost-sensitive workflowMock providers (1.7+)Native tests + mocksFree
Multi-cloud, complexFull integrationTerratest + real infraMed-High

Native Test Rules (1.6+)​

Before writing test code: validate resource schemas via Terraform MCP so assertions target real attributes.

  • command = plan — fast, for input-derived values only
  • command = apply — required for computed values (ARNs, generated names) and set-type nested blocks
  • Set-type blocks cannot be indexed with [0] — use for expressions or materialize via command = apply
  • Common set types: S3 encryption rules, lifecycle transitions, IAM policy statements

See Testing Frameworks for static-analysis pipelines, native-test patterns, Terratest integration, mock providers, and the full LLM-mistake checklist.

Count vs For_Each — Quick Rule​

ScenarioUseWhy
Boolean condition (create / don't)count = condition ? 1 : 0Optional singleton toggle
Items may be reordered or removedfor_each = toset(list)Stable resource addresses
Reference by keyfor_each = mapNamed access
Multiple named resourcesfor_eachBetter identity stability

Never use list index as long-lived identity — removing a middle element reshuffles every address after it. For the decision matrix, safe migration playbook, moved block patterns, and known-at-plan failure cases, see Code Patterns: count vs for_each.

Locals for Dependency Management​

Using try() in a local to prefer a conditional resource's attribute over its parent is a specialized but high-value pattern — it forces correct deletion order without explicit depends_on. Common use: VPC + secondary CIDR associations + subnets.

See Code Patterns: Locals for Dependency Management for the full pattern and worked example.

Module Development​

Standard layout:

my-module/
├── README.md # Usage documentation
├── main.tf # Primary resources
├── variables.tf # Typed inputs with descriptions
├── outputs.tf # Output values
├── versions.tf # required_version + required_providers
├── examples/
│ ├── minimal/
│ └── complete/
└── tests/
└── module_test.tftest.hcl # or Go for Terratest

Variable contracts: always description, always explicit type, use validation for complex constraints, use sensitive = true for secrets, prefer optional() with typed defaults (1.3+) over untyped map(any).

Output contracts: always description, mark sensitive outputs, expose stable subsets (not whole provider objects).

See Module Patterns for the full contract patterns, module release checklist, and LLM-mistake checklist.

CI/CD​

Pipeline stages: validate → test → plan → apply (with environment protection).

Cost control: mock providers on PR validation, real-cloud integration only on main or scheduled, tag test resources, auto-cleanup.

Drift prevention: pin runtime and providers, commit .terraform.lock.hcl, apply the reviewed plan artifact from the plan stage (do not re-run plan inside the apply job), run policy/security stage on every path to apply.

See CI/CD Workflows for GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Atlantis templates plus the LLM-mistake checklist.

Security & Compliance​

Essential checks:

trivy config .
checkov -d .

Don't: store secrets in variables or .tfvars, use default VPC, skip encryption, open security groups to 0.0.0.0/0, use inline ingress/egress blocks in aws_security_group.

Do: source secrets from a cloud secret manager (AWS Secrets Manager / Azure Key Vault / GCP Secret Manager) or use write_only arguments on 1.11+, create dedicated VPCs, enforce encryption at rest and TLS, least-privilege SGs, use separate aws_vpc_security_group_{ingress,egress}_rule resources (e.g. AWS provider v5+).

Marking a variable sensitive = true masks display only — the value still lives in state. Use write_only / *_wo on 1.11+, or keep secret material out of Terraform entirely via runtime lookups.

See Security & Compliance for trivy/checkov pipelines, state-file hardening, compliance mappings, and the LLM-mistake checklist.

State Management​

Never use local state in teams or production. Remote backends provide automatic locking, encryption, versioning, audit logging, and safe collaboration.

Choosing a Remote Backend​

AWS example (Azure azurerm / GCP gcs / TF Cloud syntax: see State Management: Choosing a Remote Backend):

terraform {
backend "s3" {
bucket = "my-terraform-state"
key = "prod/vpc/terraform.tfstate"
region = "us-east-1"
encrypt = true
use_lockfile = true # Native S3 locking, 1.10+
}
}

On Terraform < 1.10, use dynamodb_table = "terraform-state-lock" instead of use_lockfile. Azure Storage, GCS, and Terraform Cloud all offer built-in locking - see the State Management reference for syntax. For choosing among backends and their locking models, see Choosing a Remote Backend.

State Organization​

PatternUse WhenExample Path
Per environmentDifferent teams per envprod/terraform.tfstate, staging/...
Per componentIndependent lifecyclesprod/vpc/, prod/eks/, prod/rds/
Hybrid (recommended)Both benefitsprod/networking/, prod/compute/, staging/networking/

Split state when: different teams, different update cadences, or >500 resources. Combine when: tightly coupled resources, <100 resources, same lifecycle.

See State Management for locking, migration, multi-team isolation, disaster recovery, and the LLM-mistake checklist.

Version Management​

ComponentStrategyExample
Terraform runtimePin minorrequired_version = "~> 1.9"
ProvidersPin majorversion = "~> 5.0"
Modules (prod)Pin exactversion = "5.1.2"
Modules (dev)Allow patchversion = "~> 5.1"

Commit .terraform.lock.hcl intentionally. Keep provider/runtime upgrades in a separate PR from functional changes. See Code Patterns: Version Management for constraint syntax and upgrade workflow.

Modern Terraform Features (1.0+)​

FeatureMin versionCommon use
try()0.13+Safe fallbacks, replaces element(concat())
nullable = false1.1+Prevent null silently overriding defaults
moved blocks1.1+Refactor without destroy/recreate
optional() with defaults1.3+Typed object attributes
import blocks1.5+Declarative imports, reviewable in VCS
check blocks1.5+Runtime assertions
Native terraform test1.6+Built-in test framework
Mock providers1.7+Cost-free unit testing
removed blocks1.7+Declarative resource removal
Provider-defined functions1.8+Provider-specific transformations (requires provider to declare functions)
Cross-variable validation1.9+Reference other var.* in validation blocks
write_only arguments1.11+Secrets never stored in state
S3 native lock-file1.10+State locking without DynamoDB

Before emitting a feature, verify the runtime floor. See Code Patterns: Feature Guard Table for the full table with common LLM error patterns per feature.

Runtime-Specific Guidance​

  • Terraform 1.0-1.5 (OpenTofu starts at 1.6): Terratest for integration, static analysis + plan validation only (no native tests).
  • 1.6+: native terraform test / tofu test available — migrate simple unit tests, keep Terratest for complex integration.
  • 1.7+: mock providers cut test cost — mock for unit tests, real runs for final integration.
  • 1.10+: S3 native lock-file (use_lockfile) is the correct default for new configurations — DynamoDB locking is no longer required.
  • 1.11+: write_only arguments for secret handling keep credentials out of state.
  • Terraform vs OpenTofu: both supported. For licensing, governance, and feature delta, see Quick Reference: Terraform vs OpenTofu.

Code Intelligence (terraform-ls)​

Semantic navigation for HCL. terraform-ls is optional; without it every row below degrades to a disclosed rg + Read fallback.

Self-contained terraform-ls layer of a generic code-intelligence discipline - apply the rows below directly. Recommended companion: the code-intelligence plugin (same antonbabenko/agent-plugins marketplace) carries the generic discipline (position anchoring, degradation gate, disclosure format, anti-phantom-shim) and ships /code-intelligence:doctor for readiness. If it is installed, defer to its generic protocol; this skill stays fully self-contained without it.

GoalUseTradeoff
Find definition / all referencesterraform-ls goToDefinition / findReferencesNeeds init + a position anchor
Rename value symbol (var/local/output/provider alias)Manual: findReferences -> per-file fresh Read -> edit -> validateNo rename provider
Rename resource/module addressmoved block + plan shows 0 destroyText rename forces destroy/recreate
Exact text / known name / .tfvars / non-HCLrg + ReadNo semantic scope

✅ Supported: goToDefinition, findReferences, documentSymbol, hover, workspaceSymbol. ❌ Unsupported: goToImplementation, call hierarchy, rename provider. Do not call these then report their absence as a finding.

  • ✅ Prereq: local terraform/tofu on PATH, terraform init run; cold start may need one retry.
  • ✅ LSP calls are position-anchored (file:line:character) - anchor with rg first, never symbol-name-only.
  • ❌ Do not claim "LSP broken, using rg" until the Degradation Gate passes; disclose any tool substitution on the first line.

Depth: Code Intelligence.

Reference Files​

Progressive disclosure — essentials here, depth on demand:

  • Testing Frameworks — static analysis, native tests, Terratest, mock providers
  • Module Patterns — structure, variable/output contracts, terraform_remote_state rules, release checklist
  • CI/CD Workflows — GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Atlantis, cost control
  • Security & Compliance — trivy/checkov, secrets handling, compliance mappings
  • State Management — backends, locking, migration, multi-team, recovery
  • Code Patterns — block ordering, count/for_each deep dive, modern features, version management, locals
  • Code Intelligence - terraform-ls capabilities, position-anchored calls, manual rename, degradation gate
  • Quick Reference — command cheat sheets, flowcharts, troubleshooting

License​

Apache License 2.0. See LICENSE for full terms.

Copyright © 2026 Anton Babenko